House Republicans pass first government funding bill under new Speaker

House Republicans on Thursday passed a sprawling partisan energy plan, the first funding bill approved on the floor since the lower chamber ousted its Speaker more than three weeks ago.

The measure passed in 210-199 vote Thursday afternoon, with just one Republican no vote. It is only the second piece of legislation to cross the floor after the House installed Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Wednesday.

“This is the first step in getting our appropriations done,” Johnson said shortly after passage. “Yesterday, I promised we were going to get back to work for the American people and today we proved it.”

The bill cuts more than $5 billion in spending that was passed as part of Democrats’ signature climate, tax and health care bill — which was approved without GOP support last year.

The legislation is unlikely to become law, as the White House has threatened to veto it, but it represents the House Republican position on energy- and water-related issues as they negotiate 2024 funding with the Democrat-led Senate and the White House.

Rep. Ken Buck (Colo.) was the only Republican to vote with Democrats against the measure. Buck spokesperson Victoria Marshall said in an email that the congressman voted no because he had wanted funding in the bill to remain at 2019 levels.

Among other provisions, the legislation passed by the House on Thursday targets a program that gives rebates to consumers who purchase electric appliances.

It would also cut a program in the climate bill aimed at helping state and local governments adopt climate-friendly building codes.

Ahead of the bill’s passage, Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.), who heads the subcommittee tasked with crafting the funding bill, defended the measure on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, as making “America safer, more energy secure and increases our global economic competitiveness.”

He added that Republicans “are investing in America while cutting billions in wasteful, unnecessary, and inflationary spending.”

On the other hand, when it threatened to veto the bill this month, the White House said that the climate cuts would “result in unacceptable harm to clean energy and energy efficiency initiatives that lower energy costs and critical investments in rural America.”

Please think about donating below.

DONATE TO CH00 CH00 NEW