Hailed as a “feminist masterpiece,” The Substance gained notoriety for scenes so gory that they reportedly caused people to walk out of theatres. That’s some pretty good publicity for a body horror movie. The hype continued as The Substance also won Best Screenplay at Cannes while enjoying a constant flow of rave reviews from media critics.
But then more people watched the movie, and many found it grating, nonsensical, and in total opposition to its supposed feminist message. So, who’s right about The Substance?
Well, there’s one thing we need to know about mass media critics: They praise movies based on agendas, not on inherent quality. And they love toxic, debased stories that are justified due to “feminism.” For instance, the 2023 movie Poor Things recently won numerous accolades (including Oscars) because of its supposed feminist message. In actuality, it is about a child in a woman’s body having sex with older men.
Oddly enough, the actress Margaret Qualley stars in both Poor Things and The Substance, and, in both cases, she plays the role of an ungodly mutation of a human being.
In The Substance, Margaret Qualley plays Sue, a younger and hotter version of Elizabeth Sparkle (played by Demi Moore), an aging Hollywood star. Sue came into existence because Sparkle injected herself with an illicit, black-market product that promised a “younger, more beautiful, more perfect” version of herself.
This premise led many to wonder: Is this movie about adrenochrome, that mysterious substance rumored to be consumed in elite circles for youth and vitality?
WALK BY FAITH, NOT BY SIGHT, ARMOR UP DAILY & PUT YOUR WHOLE TRUST IN GOD, NOT MAN!!!!!
Please Pray for President Trump, his family, America, my hubs, and me!
God Bless You and Your Families!
Love,
Please think about donating below.