A report published by the Royal Society claims that lockdowns and other social distancing measures, as well as mask-wearing, significantly cut the transmission of the coronavirus during the fake pandemic.
Well, of course, they did!
If you lock people in their homes and make them stay away from their loved ones then they are less likely to spread infections. (Note, please, that only the intellectually deprived, aficionados of pseudoscience and people with the IQ of a table believe that germs don’t exist. The people who believe there are no germs probably also believe that the earth is flat and that climate change is real.)
If we had lockdowns and social distancing rules every winter then there would always be fewer cases of the flu.
It’s as sensible as saying that if we killed everyone in November then there would be no cases of flu during the winter.
Infections cannot spread unless people are within coughing distance of one another.
(Masks are something else, of course. As I proved in my book ‘Proof that Face Masks do More Harm than Good’, face masks did massive amounts of damage to people’s health. And they don’t work.)
The problem with the Royal Society’s report is that as far as I can see they don’t seem to have bothered to mention that the number of people killed by the lockdowns far, far exceeded the number of people who didn’t get the flu.
(And let’s remember that we are talking about the flu. It was always clear that covid-19 was merely a well-marketed brand of the flu. All the evidence – which I’ve previously detailed in my videos and on my websites – now proves this.)
The lockdowns did massive physical and mental harm to the nation.
Please think about donating below.