In 2021, MIT Technology Review published an article ‘Carbon removal hype is becoming a dangerous distraction’. “Corporations and nations are touting plans to suck greenhouse gases out of the air … The noise, news and hype are feeding a perception that carbon removal will be cheap, simple, scalable, and reliable – none of which we can count on,” the article said.
What was carbon removal distracting from? Not real-world problems, unfortunately, but from “cost-effective actions needed to cut [carbon dioxide] emissions.”
In other words, one side of the climate change industry was attacking another side of the climate change industry. What MIT failed to acknowledge is that the whole anthropogenic climate change ideology is built on “noise, news and hype.”
Commenting on MIT’s 2021 article and calling their bluff, CFact asked the question: “Who has the most to lose if the combination of US agriculture, Nuclear power and an efficient point of generation carbon capture is put together?” He listed the losers as:
- An entire political agenda that advocates for the ending of the foundational values that made the USA great.
- Large technological and corporate interests that have invested in the kind of money that is involved in solving the “climate change” problem but not in an inexpensive way.
- Research-based organisations that have invested time, money and reputation in this issue so that having it cheaply eliminated would not be in the best interest of them.
ARMOR OF GOD everyday, do Communion and make sure you have your Bibles on hand for The Word of The Lord.
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
God Bless You and Your Families!
Love,
Please think about donating below.