Biden DOJ Silent On Whether It Will Enforce Fed Law Barring Protests at Justice’s Homes



Choo Choo





“O come, let us worship and bow down: let us kneel before the LORD our maker.”  Psalms 95:6 (KJV) 

The Biden Justice Department is raising the eyebrows of Republicans and others who are concerned about the safety of U.S. Supreme Court justices who signed on to a draft ruling overturning Roe v. Wade after protesters showed up at the homes of at least two of them over the weekend.

Such actions are against federal law, but so far, neither the White House nor Attorney General Merrick Garland has spoken publicly about whether it will be enforced, even as left-wing groups continue to threaten more protests.

Fox News reported:

The pro-abortion protestors are targeting the private homes of the six Republican-appointed justices after the leak last week of a draft opinion signaled the Supreme Court intends to overturn the landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade.

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who “pickets or parades” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer” near a U.S. court or “near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” will be fined, or “imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices’ homes. And the Department of Justice (DOJ) did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment on Garland’s silence and the reason why protestors have not been arrested.

Andrew McCarthy, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and a former national security federal prosecutor, told Fox News that he believes the Justice Department is politicized and has been silent on the issue of enforcing the law for the same reason as the Biden White House.

“They are elevating their political interest in portraying the draft Supreme Court opinion as extreme over their constitutional duty to execute the laws faithfully and protect both the Court and the justices,” he said.

“I would note that months ago, when Attorney General Garland unjustifiably dispatched the FBI to investigate parents who were protesting the inclusion of racist and anti-American materials in school curricula, Garland claimed that the Justice Department had an interest in protecting teachers and school administrators,” McCarthy continued.

“Not only was it untrue that schools were under siege; the relationship between parents and schools is a state and local issue, not a federal one — hypothetically, if a parent were to assault a teacher, it would be a state crime, not a federal one,” McCarthy added.

He was referring to a Justice Dept. memo issued by Garland last fall that directed the FBI to look into “threats of violence” at school board meetings as a means of preventing threats against public school officials by parents angry over leftist ‘woke’ curriculum.

The AG drew major backlash for issuing the directive for its unprecedented nature but also because it came just days after the National School Boards Association penned a letter to Biden seeking his adm…

God Bless America & God Bless You


Made By Choo Choo



Big Bear Bald Eagle Live Nest Cam

Avon Lake Eagle Cam 3

Sunday Morning Service 6/12/2022