t
he Nuremberg trial was supposed to change the world forever. Evil elitists faced the consequences of their psychotic outcomes, which scarred the planet. They actively promoted “eugenics,” or attempts to improve humankind through “racial improvement” and “planned breeding” of people. These ideas were supported within the United States by people like Henry Ford and Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood (a history that many people would like to forget). During those times of the Nuremberg trial, the Belmont Report was produced. The Belmont Report was the U.S.’s own version that outlined the ethical considerations a scientific study must adhere to.
From that report, the National Research Act (Pub. L. 93-348) was signed into law in 1974. It forever changed how experimental studies were performed, notwithstanding Covid-19 in 2020. The Act states that in order to carry out a scientific study (still happening with those receiving the vaccines), “(i) the boundaries between biomedical and behavioral research and the accepted and routine practice of medicine, (ii) the role assessment of risk-benefit criteria in the determination of the appropriateness of research involving human subjects, (iii) appropriate guidelines for the selection of human subjects for participation in such research and (iv) the nature and definition of informed consent in various research settings.”
These statements of basic ethical principles apply to scientists, Institutional Review Boards, and Federal Employees… the very people whom today are especially failing all of society in the name of COVID-19 prevention and protection. Let there be no doubt; we are being plowed over with a freight train that has barreled through our own system of ethical practices and protections resulting from the horrendous eugenics experiments fostered on the human race in the name of science.
We have all been part of a huge social and medical experiment without consent and in the name of fear. Brownstone.org put out an article outlining 400 plus studies pointing out the failures of the draconian COVID lockdowns and mandates. At best, an exaggeration; at worst, an outright lie, the restrictions that were declared a success were shown to increase depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and psychological harm. In my own life, I watched my mother’s oncology appointment get canceled because it was too “dangerous” for her to see a doctor. How many people were left to suffer from illness, unable to get necessary medical attention and treatment?
